tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post3065556405372793520..comments2024-03-18T02:14:57.204-07:00Comments on Google Operating System: Google Image Search Adds Infinite Scrolling and Shows Less ClutterAlex Chituhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02618542750965508582noreply@blogger.comBlogger117125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-76360596899779706212013-01-30T10:40:29.487-08:002013-01-30T10:40:29.487-08:00Google Image Search has a new interface and you ca...Google Image Search has <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-google-image-search-interface.html" rel="nofollow">a new interface</a> and you can't go back to the previous one. Alex Chituhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02618542750965508582noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-76199229778144442722013-01-30T10:33:31.068-08:002013-01-30T10:33:31.068-08:00I have a problem:
On my laptop, I used to be able...I have a problem: <br />On my laptop, I used to be able to see the google search images enlarged if I passed the cursor over them, just like in my netbook. <br />However, about a week ago, whenever I did this on my laptop, I have to click on the google search images to see them enlarged (it appears just below the line of the photo you are actually clicking on). <br />The thing is that on my laptop nothing has changed regarding this - just pass the cursor and the images enlarges automatically - (which I like and prefer) - and I also use google search. <br />Can anyone please explain the mystery to me? Is there a way to set the configuration of google search images to see it one way or another? Carmen16https://www.blogger.com/profile/01561656876975451569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-34035545962495917542011-09-10T07:17:24.652-07:002011-09-10T07:17:24.652-07:00It's NOT "infinite" it usually quits...It's NOT "infinite" it usually quits at page 55, 60, 70 etc. even though you've already had to click the annoying "Show More Results" (shouldn't have to click this - how many PhDs at google does it take to understand USABILITY) and even though the initial search result says 5,432,886 etc "results" it still quits at page 70, 75 etc. What an asinine "implementation" there is too much money at google.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-28525334689020405832011-07-03T03:11:42.260-07:002011-07-03T03:11:42.260-07:00You think you hate the new image search with infin...You think you hate the new image search with infinite scrolling?? Try using Google image search on your phone! It's almost impossible to switch to the basic view bc the page keeps sending you back to the top. What a pain!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-82598120482043334142011-05-18T00:06:38.897-07:002011-05-18T00:06:38.897-07:00I have tried a few of these ripper sites to gather...I have tried a few of these ripper sites to gather images off of google more easily. the one i use most is http://www.googleimageripper.com/ i simply am trying to access images though Google in mass without having to click through the thumbnails..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-25840646305285702632011-01-31T00:16:07.388-08:002011-01-31T00:16:07.388-08:00I lost infinite scrolling less than one week ago. ...I lost infinite scrolling less than one week ago. How do I get it back? I use Safari.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-43774050063445459932011-01-30T04:46:08.911-08:002011-01-30T04:46:08.911-08:00How does one disable infinite scrolling?How does one disable infinite scrolling?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-55454475754300209482010-09-26T20:46:14.400-07:002010-09-26T20:46:14.400-07:00Old interface was way better. No image sizes or i...Old interface was way better. No image sizes or info unless you hover sucks! Even if you switch to basic mode it still opens the image over the full website in the background. The problem I have with this is that it opens your machine up to viruses and popups...and no, not just searching for porn! Hahaha It also opens the images up for re-linking to more un-secure sites.......SUCKS SUCKS SUX SUX SUX!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-71825383728043866352010-09-20T06:39:05.238-07:002010-09-20T06:39:05.238-07:00Google's image search= 'new and improved&#...Google's image search= 'new and improved' waste of time. That's the best way to describe it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-14699601229785701512010-09-07T07:17:58.911-07:002010-09-07T07:17:58.911-07:00Who paid you to write this ad for Google? Jesus, t...Who paid you to write this ad for Google? Jesus, the new image search sucks so bad that I've had to switch serch providers. Forcing the 'new and improved' waste of time, money and bandwidth on us without the option to keep the old, USEFUL search is a slap in the balls.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-55670049731746294412010-09-04T10:36:19.969-07:002010-09-04T10:36:19.969-07:00I have changed to Yahoo when searching for images....I have changed to Yahoo when searching for images. Why fix something thats not broken.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-11643987408710902342010-08-28T12:18:11.682-07:002010-08-28T12:18:11.682-07:00I hate it! And to anonymous - I will not drink the...I hate it! And to anonymous - I will not drink the koolaide!The Crayon Labhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02473852338279943949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-85712168470261690612010-08-23T08:55:46.718-07:002010-08-23T08:55:46.718-07:00It mas much simpler before and it did the trick, w...It mas much simpler before and it did the trick, why fix it if it wasn't broken? I hate to scroll down to look for the pictures, at times it freezes my Firefox. And wassup with clicking on the picture just to have to load the entire website it comes from? I wish It just loaded the picture im interested in!Angel Masshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08257447097867788553noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-62135064071409094972010-08-22T07:38:05.312-07:002010-08-22T07:38:05.312-07:00This new layout is horrible. It takes forever to ...This new layout is horrible. It takes forever to scroll through the pictures. It skips and thinks about every movement because it's constantly trying to load new pics, rather than separating them to different pages. Takes forever to search images...I don't understand this change. Did anyone test it first?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-22944583016169036132010-08-21T12:42:52.553-07:002010-08-21T12:42:52.553-07:00you're out of your damn mind ... " Less C...you're out of your damn mind ... " Less Clutter " i cant even see what is on the page because a damn picture popup is always stuck to my pointer, i try to wheel scroll down the page and i cant see anything under the big popups , how is that less clutter ............ it's completely un unusableAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-42550410250619028972010-08-19T00:32:03.006-07:002010-08-19T00:32:03.006-07:00I hate this new image search with the intensity of...I hate this new image search with the intensity of a thousand suns. It is made for soccer-mom-types who have no requirements for an image beyond a quick visual reference and disrupts my workflow like you couldn't imagine. I would even prefer to have the old layout but be forced to have it stuck on displaying 1000 results at a time than have this new layout show me 20 results. The old image search would STILL probably be faster displaying that many. Who doesn't own a scroll mouse nowadays anyway? I have a pretty fast PC but using the new image search makes me feel like I'm using a 386 with a 14.4 modem again. I haven't used anything except google.com as my default home page for almost 10 years, but this horrible abomination is making me look elsewhere. Bad move, Google. Change it back or AT LEAST give us more discriminating users an opportunity to set it as a cookieAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-44267564550161604212010-08-12T22:25:26.093-07:002010-08-12T22:25:26.093-07:00i dont like the new style of google in searching i...i dont like the new style of google in searching images! I still want the old one...please bring it back! this new one is so annoying..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-11537051285717334992010-08-10T19:37:13.885-07:002010-08-10T19:37:13.885-07:00this is absolutely awful. please let us use the ol...this is absolutely awful. please let us use the old google image search.iblastoffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07408299233588035659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-84992043873684022412010-08-10T11:07:08.142-07:002010-08-10T11:07:08.142-07:00I HATE GOOGLE IMAGES !!! the old one was soo much...I HATE GOOGLE IMAGES !!! the old one was soo much better! Google's doing some dodgy mistakes this year , I hope they actually listen to us!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-16150455105611619912010-08-08T05:26:02.304-07:002010-08-08T05:26:02.304-07:00Choice would be good. There should be an option to...Choice would be good. There should be an option to turn the horrible thing off permanently and use the old pagination search method.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-88943778192654987382010-08-07T21:06:45.434-07:002010-08-07T21:06:45.434-07:00At first glance it seems to be better and more use...At first glance it seems to be better and more user friendly if you have high speed internet access...<br /><br />It was too friendly for me. I completely neglected to check the file sources, which caused me to accidentally download a virus. Luckily I was quick enough to realize what was happening and saved my computer, but I know that hundreds of users will go through the same thing. It allows you to forget that you aren't safe, even when you are looking at images of baby animals. <br /><br />ay caramba google. <br /><br />Oh and facebook seems to be following the trend as well?!Kaleynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-78663806233139863482010-08-07T06:18:42.741-07:002010-08-07T06:18:42.741-07:00Google has always been about functionality and pro...Google has always been about functionality and productivity. I like Google for that. I don't need this messy interface (*even though you said it as an innovation). I just want to search and find good relevant results.Indonesian Wavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09069601716815506976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-1390446621172173902010-08-07T05:23:56.903-07:002010-08-07T05:23:56.903-07:00I HOPE GOOGLE "LISTEN" ALL OF THIS NEGAT...I HOPE GOOGLE "LISTEN" ALL OF THIS NEGATIVE COMMENT.<br />AND REVERT GOOGLE IMAGE TO OLD STYLE AS SOON !%$%!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-44878418999920863982010-08-06T23:44:46.237-07:002010-08-06T23:44:46.237-07:00Thumbnails are downloaded as you view them. Google...Thumbnails are downloaded as you view them. Google doesn't preload hundreds of images when you search for something, so you shouldn't worry about your Internet quota.Alex Chituhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02618542750965508582noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-26502389671692243122010-08-06T23:24:06.912-07:002010-08-06T23:24:06.912-07:00I am in agreement with those who find the new imag...I am in agreement with those who find the new images search format cumbersome and non-intuitive. I can see Google may want change, but in this case the thinking hasn't been thorough enough. <br /><br />When I search for an image, or for a text page for that matter, I usually come across what I am looking for within the first two pages or so in the old system. I can also jump to much later pages if I'm just researching by random. The new system offers me far too many images at the cost of my download quota. Here in Australia we still have slow download and high prices for download.<br /><br />I find the image enlargement redundant. I either want to skip past it, because I can see it isn't what I want, or go to the web page and don't need an enlargement. I also find it frustrating that if I am resting my mouse, while I look at the images offered in overview, I can trigger an unwanted image into the main view and have to act to make it slide back into place.<br /><br />When I go to the web-page I prefer the page below and Google's info above. I don't have to close the top frame to see the page and I don't have to close an enlarged picture forced upon me before I can continue to view the page. This feature definitely needs rethinking.<br /><br />It's my view not offering a permanent return to the old style for those who prefer it, even if I was a new style fan, contemptuous of the users, us. Every good software, or innovation, should provide a good removal tool, or in this case, a permanent reversion tool.<br /><br />What I would like to know is if Google will pay any attention to all these negative comments and come up with both a restoration option, and a new hybrid style that makes everyone happy. Feedback has always seemed a hit and miss affair in the past.<br /><br />I would like to stay with Google as my search engine, but I will now look at the others in case there is no progress on this matter.<br /><br />PS for those making negative remarks about those of a different opinion, get over it; that's what makes for a vibrant Internet, difference.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02321577674129771170noreply@blogger.com