tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post116445985928402543..comments2024-03-18T02:14:57.204-07:00Comments on Google Operating System: Google Video - Legal Problems in EuropeAlex Chituhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02618542750965508582noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-1164510636997392112006-11-25T19:10:00.000-08:002006-11-25T19:10:00.000-08:00For what I understand....Google does a technical v...For what I understand....<BR/><BR/>Google does a technical validation of user submission. Meaning the recived file is automatically checked for specific file format, size and whatever. I suppose they also do an automatic check for specific words in description (even if that is passible to be faulty as isn't easy to implement a good filter)<BR/><BR/>Also there's 2 kind of sunmission types....<BR/>Web based and the one that needs a specific program/client.<BR/><BR/>The latter one is for files over 100mb in size. And I think that those submission get a better check. Eventually to prevent users to sunmit entire films. Not that this can't happen anyway, expecially for indie films that are less known. I think error can still be present.<BR/><BR/>For small sized sunmission I don't think there's control. And would be hardly possible considering the amount.<BR/><BR/>I've tried myself to submit videos with both method. In one case you are placed in a pending approval for days. In the other, your video will be made avaible in about an hour (Suppose an hour is needed for google to convert formats, index and send entire file on different location/clusters for avaibility)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-1164492354816856042006-11-25T14:05:00.000-08:002006-11-25T14:05:00.000-08:00Are Google videos not validated by Google before b...Are Google videos not validated by Google before being published upon GV? If so, that means its Google's fault for letting this one slip. Whereas YouTube doesnt validate the videos first so they cannot be blamed for letting one slip through validation. <BR/><BR/>"If it is, we could consider guilty also ISP's, phone companies and so on."<BR/><BR/>Not really due to the fact the ISP's and Phone Companies do not say "We will validate this video", it is Google who says they will validate it, therefore its their own fault.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-1164480991915961982006-11-25T10:56:00.000-08:002006-11-25T10:56:00.000-08:00Imho, if google is to be complained.... for more r...Imho, if google is to be complained.... for more reason are those that had seen that video and never acted for a removal.<BR/><BR/>On the right of each video, along with commants and so on, there's a link to report bad videos. Just 2 clicks to report a video. One to select report, and another to select the type of report (there's 4-5 types)<BR/><BR/>I'm Italian and I followed the entire story from the very beginning (is on all newspapers in italy).<BR/><BR/>As I know, Google promptly removed the video.<BR/>Also, authors of the video had been found in a mere couple of days with collaboration of Google with police (after judge opened the case, obviously).<BR/><BR/>In some part it's true, Google can't be held responsible for what had been shown. If it is, we could consider guilty also ISP's, phone companies and so on.<BR/><BR/>On the other hand, vividown is trying to claim Google responsability also because that video ranked in the top 100 videos.<BR/><BR/>Let's see what happen in the future.... :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com