tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post8915551383806408851..comments2024-03-18T02:14:57.204-07:00Comments on Google Operating System: Google Image Search Exposes Content FiltersAlex Chituhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02618542750965508582noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-86598347269014042622008-11-15T15:43:00.000-08:002008-11-15T15:43:00.000-08:00If only moderate search workedhttp://images.google...If only moderate search worked<BR/><BR/>http://images.google.com/images?&q=bathtub<BR/><BR/>"Moderate SafeSearch is on"<BR/><BR/>result #2:<BR/><BR/>http://evilbeetgossip.film.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/jessica_bathtub.jpg<BR/><BR/><BR/>result #12<BR/><BR/>http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:6hLcToUdE0KhAM:http://klaudiamarrgallery.com/images/links/2481-In_the_Bathtub.jpg<BR/><BR/><BR/>:(comment gravity wellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04816325304967624659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-87911309713986982252008-11-03T06:21:00.000-08:002008-11-03T06:21:00.000-08:00Is that feature useful enough to be on every resul...Is that feature useful enough to be on every result page? The "news" restriction, I don't know about that. The "face" restriction, perhaps something one would only rarely use. And the "photos" restriction doesn't really work as intended sometimes. E.g. searching for [mickey mouse] "photos" brings back cartoons (which is incorrect) or photos of cartoons (which may be correct, but perhaps not what was intended).Philipp Lenssenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09340991515644165702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-31094273140984742052008-11-03T05:26:00.000-08:002008-11-03T05:26:00.000-08:00Yes, but the main question about these filters is ...Yes, but the main question about these filters is how well they work, not how many each search engine has!son_of_malcomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02566675266279647829noreply@blogger.com