While there are many start-ups called by the media "Google killers", becoming more popular than Google is increasingly difficult. Even if Google started with an algorithm for search, it built an infrastructure that prepared its later expansion and became more important than the initial innovation. From New York Times:
Consider the question of Google's greatest business secret. Is it the algorithms behind its search tools? Or is it the way it organizes vast clusters of computers around the globe to answer queries so quickly? Perhaps predictably, Google won't disclose the number of computers deployed in its vast information network (though outsiders speculate that the network has at least 450,000 computers).
I believe that the physical network is Google's "secret sauce," its premier competitive advantage. While a brilliant lone wolf can conceive of a dazzling algorithm, only a superwealthy and well-managed organization can run what is arguably the most valuable computer network on the planet. Without the computer network, Google is nothing.
Eric E. Schmidt, Google's chief executive, appears to agree. Last year he declared, "We believe we get tremendous competitive advantage by essentially building our own infrastructures."
Process innovations like Google's computer network are often invisible to the public, and impossible to duplicate by rivals. Yet successful companies realize that maintaining competitive advantage depends heavily on sustaining process innovations. Great process innovators often support basic research in relevant fields, maintain complete control over the creation of every aspect of a product and refuse to rely on outside suppliers for important components.
Google built a file system "for large distributed data-intensive applications", a programming model and a distributed storage system called BigTable that works on top of Google's file system. Hadoop, an open source project supported by Yahoo, wants to replicate Google's distributed systems.
{ Image from Eric Schmidt's presentation at the Stanford Graduate School of Business in April 2004. }
Yahoo steals so much from google...yet google is still better! woo
ReplyDeleteat Nick,
ReplyDeleteI think you are wrong.. Yahoo! is a pioneer in so many things..
Infact google has been sued by yahoo in the past http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adwords#Legal_context
Yahoo is still cool with its tools.. and yahoo search has improved a lot these days
That is really interesting - thanks for the info!
ReplyDeleteJust attempt to contact yahoo technical support for ANYTHING and you will find out how bad Yahoo really is...
ReplyDelete72 hour standard response time and off shore to boot!
Google - stable, fast, innovative.
yahoo - ummm well ya.
Yes, personally I like google - but to be honest, I'm really disappointed with their customer support. All the other aspects of Google is just excellent.
ReplyDeleteI think google is so much better. Much faster. Yahoo steals so much from google. I think Yahoo is still making improvements. I think they are just basically the same thing, but google has more pages and websites to search from and yahoo has less pages to search from.
ReplyDelete