We certainly haven't forgotten about our client users and we've been listening to your comments (here, in the Google Talk Help Discussion Group, and on the feedback forms). We hear you loud and clear; you love the client and you want it to have all the great new features that have been added to Gmail Chat or the Google Talk Gadget. We know that it's important to be able to chat inside and outside of your browser and that it's important to have a full array of features at your fingertips in both places. In short, you want to be able to choose how to connect to the Google Talk service without having to make any major feature trade-offs. We're completely with you on this one -- we want that too!
Now, I suspect some of you are thinking: if you're with us on that, why aren't all features available on the client right now? Well, we've got a lot on our plate here at Google Talk and we're always negotiating what we can get done. At the moment, we're focusing our energy on developing platforms that will let us make Google Talk better for all our users, whether they want a web-based experience or a client experience. There is still much to done, but we're committed to continually improving the Google Talk user experience for everyone.
As Jeff suggested in the comments, all these delayed Google Talk updates could be caused by a future integration with GrandCentral. "Although you haven't heard as much from us in the past few months as you did before, we are working hard every day on the next great version of GrandCentral and a ton of cool new features," informs up a post from GrandCentral Blog.
{ Thank you, Ender. }
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI have no problem with a browser interface *in general*, but for an IM it is just unsuitable. It's too easy to accidentally close your browser rather than closing a tab (at least I do that a lot) and browsers have a habit fo closing themselves (the so-called silent crash mode) a few times a day for me, they are notorious for leaking and fragmenting memory.
ReplyDeleteI have no desire to mess with it again until there is a Linux client. I could be waiting a long time from what I read. Why couldn't they just do the following:
Implement a brain-dead web browser (from Open Sources, possibly) that does nothing other than support a single Flash instance. You would still have three code bases I guess, for Windows, OS X and Linux, but it seems like it would be fairly simple code. And all the visual details would be in common Flash code with the browser shell being fairly static.
Anyway, that would be my design approach while I work on the ultimate solution.
Gtalk is so-o-o old that people forgot using it already.
ReplyDeleteI have an invite to Grand Central and it doesn't provide me any added value. FWD and Gizmo are a lot more user friendly. The lack of extensive SIP support is ridiculous! Besides I cant register and forward calls to my UK number even if I want to pay for the service, amazing!
Gtalk better come up soon with a great new release or should buy Skype if they want any users at all.
They should integrate Hello (http://www.hello.com/) with Google Talk, too.
ReplyDelete@cookie
ReplyDeletephoto and video integration is already available in Gtalk through a third party plug-in
@n1pster:
ReplyDeleteWhere?
it would indeed be nice to see some unity among the disparate google talk implementations. the labs edition of talk seems to be making interesting inroads, but it remains to be seen if the gmail chat will catch up..i find the desktop gadget annoying when using multiple pc's in multiple locations...at times messages will appear in one session and not another, i think this is the biggest issue to solve so that messages don't get lost when switching from one machine to another
ReplyDelete