said on October 29, 2007 12:00 PM PDT:
I agree with your last line. Google should filter spam from blogger. I can't tell you how many blogs all contain the same crap such as 'Cialis Buy' , 'Buy Viagra' and so on.
said on October 29, 2007 12:49 PM PDT:
gmail blows!
What an irony that Adsense serves up another anti-spam service :-)
said on October 29, 2007 2:54 PM PDT:
It is to bad that Google can stop all the mail that has been identified as spam at their server and not letting it get to the individual accounts and just dump it there..
Guffy said on October 29, 2007 3:14 PM PDT:
I find that GMail does an excellent job of identifying spam. I have used hotmail and yahoo but since getting GMail when it first came out, I would NEVER use anything else.
GMail and Google ROCK!!
TOMHTML said on October 29, 2007 3:18 PM PDT:
They have forgotten a curve on their graph: FALSE POSITIVES!!!
said on October 29, 2007 3:21 PM PDT:
I don't agree here. Gmail may be good in blocking SPAM but the best of the lot is AOL. I am active yahoo,gmail and aol mail user. I think twice before giving my gmail and yahoo ID but never care about AOL ID. Yet, my AOL spam folder is "always" empty. Gmail's spam folder become very fat very soon. Yahoo is the worst. (I never used hotmail). Never had issues with AOL. If you don't believe me, try it out.
Dennis said on October 29, 2007 3:29 PM PDT:
I heartily agree that Gmail does an excellent job in spam filtering - better than any other email filtering that I have used. I would make better use of Yahoo! except that tons of spam gets through their filters. I've even got all of my POP email accounts now going through Gmail because it does the best job of removing spam. In the two years that I have been using Gmail, I would venture to guess that it has let fewer than a dozen spam messages through, and has falsely identified even fewer non-spam messages. Google definitely has their act together when it comes to spam filtering.
Andy Wong said on October 29, 2007 3:53 PM PDT:
It is better that Google sell her mighty of spam filtering to ISP and enterprise users who want to host their own mail servers. I expect Google Exchange will be out to market in a few years.
More at
http://webandlife.blogspot.com/2007/07/google-exchange.html
Brett said on October 29, 2007 7:58 PM PDT:
google bought postini, which is the best spam blocker to date.
ken215 said on October 29, 2007 8:15 PM PDT:
It is to bad that Google can stop all the mail that has been identified as spam at their server and not letting it get to the individual accounts and just dump it there..Google doesn't block spam emails. They just go into the spam folder instead of the inbox. You can see all of your spam for the past 30 days there.
I believe Gmail is the best SPAM filtering system so far.
said on October 29, 2007 8:42 PM PDT:
I think Google should share this technology with the world so we can eliminate spam once and for all... everywhere.
fak3r said on October 29, 2007 8:59 PM PDT:
Great article, more people should realize how much better Gmail is at fighting Spam. I used to run my own mailserver and was just getting overwhelmed trying to keep up, once Google Apps for Domains came out I gave it a go, and I've been very happy I did. As another poster said, I even route outer accounts thru Gmail because of the spam filtering. I guess the only thing I'd prefer is that they just block spam before it reaches me; will there be false positives? Probably, but that percentage is so small I don't care; we have to cut at some point, I'd rather go with how they're lining things up.
I guess having the same email address since 2001 gets you on quite a few spam lists, but as long as Gmail keeps up, I'll be a happy camper.
said on October 29, 2007 9:30 PM PDT:
Do us a favour. Choke on your copy/paste blogspam, mmmkay?
said on October 29, 2007 9:35 PM PDT:
so..... where's the 'HOW'? I was expecting a phat way to optimize SpamAssassin and ClamAV with Postfix. This is just Googlite Pr0n. Everyone's gonna be feeling mad shitty when Google turns on us and starts turning over personal info. Wait....
too late
@last anonymous:
What blogspam? I didn't submit this to Digg, so it's not my problem. I wrote about this because it was interesting for this blog and quoted from Google's page because I couldn't invent all that data about Gmail's spam filters.
This blog is not written for Digg, Slashdot or another site, so I shouldn't be responsible if you can't filter the good things.
Dmitri said on October 29, 2007 10:57 PM PDT:
Ok... I praise very often Gmail spam system.
Usually, my Gmail account has from 1000 to 2000 emails in it. In other words, I receive monthly that amount of spam!
Many comments, as well as original post, make sense... But I couldn't stand Techmine's comment. So I just wanted to comment on his statement about AOL and Gmail accounts:
-If your spam folder is EMPTY, it means it's NOT WORKING!
- If your spam folder is BIG, it means it's WORKING perfectly!
- If your spam folder is EMPTY and you still don't get any spam in Inbox, it means that either the service deletes your emails for you (means you can't retrieve false positives if there are any) or you simply don't get any spam (which means commenting about it's spam filtering is DUMB, cause you never tested it!).
I have written an article about gmail and spam. Check it out http://dpanic.googlepages.com/spam.pdf
interestingly, my gmail account gets a hundred or so emails in my spam box each day. my hotmail account gets none. NONE.
i'm not convinced if that's good spam filtering or whether my gmail account is a target for spammers.
either way. i think it's odd ... especially since my hotmail used to get a lot of spam.
Using Gmail with Firefox knocks off my internet connection - not always but at least 80% of the time. Using Blogger (another Google site) does the same. I now use Interent Explorere for Google related sites and Firefox for the rest. I would be grateful to hear from anybody who has had the same problem and knows of a sloution.
Oaf357 said on October 30, 2007 2:16 AM PDT:
While Gmail does a fairly decent job I have to admit I'm not impressed. The way I have things setup there are two spam filters in place before my mail gets to Google's servers. Spam STILL gets through.
To those who praise a zero-spam account and despise some spam or false positives getting through: imagine you go to your doctor for a check-up every day and he/she hasn't found anything, not a cold in 20 years... would you be just happy or a bit suspiscious?
BTW, this article really doesn't explain anything about how the filters work, but the video is funny.
Wolfie said on October 30, 2007 3:24 AM PDT:
I do love Gmail mainly due to the spam filtering. I can post my email any where on the web and it doesn't matter as all spam is caught.
Not even I get a lot of spam because of that, I have two accounts, one public and one private, and my private one still gets loads of spam despite only a select few people have it (you can count on your fingers).
I recently moved all my girlfriend's accounts to gmail (using POP) and she has noticed the differences straight away (and loves having all her emails in one place!)
said on October 30, 2007 3:46 AM PDT:
buy c1alis! buy v1agra!
LikeVid said on October 30, 2007 5:38 AM PDT:
I feel they tried a little too hard to make it funny...sorta fell flat..but at least the music was done right.
Also Gmail is great, but I call
BS on the OCR technology.
said on October 30, 2007 7:09 AM PDT:
Hahahahaha
Coolest video ever. Great article as well. I've been using Gmail for a while and even though it looks spartan it's much more usable than hotmail, which I was using previously.
said on October 30, 2007 7:46 AM PDT:
Gmail sucks at identifying spam.
Example: one of the newsletters I receive.
It often goes to the spam box.
Despite being listed as a CONTACT.
Despite being listed as NON-SPAM!
Fix this shit, Google.
We need whitelists and blacklists.
A great topic to investigate: how can we all neutralize spam? Google's technologies could be applied to their blogs, as you note, which are veritable spam notepads. Microsoft could make available free patches to any version of their operating system, licensed or not, that do essential things like install a firewall and turn off windows networking. We could also encourage MS to fix IE, instead of running away to Firefox or (better) Opera.
Christian said on October 30, 2007 8:16 AM PDT:
Hm.. great stuff... and a funny video from Google... have to love a company that can make jokes and not be totally executive & business like.
And ofc if they could create a spamfighter program for use in email clients like outlook, thunderbird (ofc thunderbirds learning spam filter is quite good), etc.
That would be worht quite a bit of money I would think.
Wanderer said on October 30, 2007 10:47 AM PDT:
I dumped my Yahoo account after nearly 10 years of use because the spam filters are worthless. I would get 20-30 spam messages a day. Since switching to Gmail nearly a year ago I have received 1 true spam message in my Inbox.
Hmm... In the last 5-6 months I have deleted as much spam from my Inbox as the Gmail filters have picked out for me... Stuff like:
UK LOTTERY WINNER
MICROSOFT REWARDS PROGRAM
YOU'RE OUR WEEKLY WINNER
etc...
I don't care how Gmail collects the stuff, just do a better job at it. Somehow the spammers have found a hole in the protection; it's time to plug whatever hole that is.
@The Average White Guy:
Your comment was classified as spam by Gmail :)
said on October 30, 2007 1:40 PM PDT:
How come I get no span in Hotmail, but 10-20 messages a day in gmail?
Google is effective because it uses the Bayesian Spam filtering Technique.
If you miss the spam, it will the last time, because, once you label it it will learn how to and what to. The learning accumulates and thence the graph shown in this post
http://ajabgajab.blogspot.com/2007/07/bayesian-spam-filtering.html
David said on October 30, 2007 7:07 PM PDT:
Gmail is fantastic... I don't use the web interface.
I forward all my email accounts (about 10, accounts like 'sales' and 'service') to my gmail account and then have them forwarded to my *1* account.
Almost perfect... And fast too!
Ulo said on October 30, 2007 9:37 PM PDT:
I'm learning Esperanto!
:)
axet said on October 31, 2007 9:32 PM PDT:
If i dont want to partipiate, how i can disable\remove spam folder?
said on November 2, 2007 5:54 AM PDT:
Although gmail does very good job on eliminating spams, I feel that false-positive rate is rather higher compared to other providers. I must say false-positive is much less desireble than false-negative.
Eric said on November 2, 2007 10:51 AM PDT:
Techmine said "I don't agree here. Gmail may be good in blocking SPAM but the best of the lot is AOL. I am active yahoo,gmail and aol mail user. I think twice before giving my gmail and yahoo ID but never care about AOL ID. Yet, my AOL spam folder is "always" empty. Gmail's spam folder become very fat very soon. Yahoo is the worst. (I never used hotmail). Never had issues with AOL. If you don't believe me, try it out."That is what gmail does best, lots of storage so that if you do get a message marked as spam you might have the option to undo the spam tag. lets face it, how much space are you actually using from the available pool. FTA, gmail uses user feedback to help improve the spam filter. What I might call spam doesn't necessarily make it spam.
OldMaven said on November 6, 2007 10:37 AM PDT:
I kinda have different opinion on this.
A SPAM FILTER cannot be judged as working better, if we see less of SPAMS on our SPAM folder. It is entirely dependent on the policy on the mail server, that scores the message. Lets say : any message below 5 gets into your INBOX, between 5 and 15 gets into your SPAM folder, and above 15 is deleted from the server.
I was expecting Google give us those statistics [ scoring rules/heuristics or policy ] to actually compare with other spam filters, and this article is just vague.
said on November 13, 2007 4:54 PM PDT:
Does Gmail offer some type of Feedback loop for senders to process user complaints?
TechPark said on November 20, 2007 4:40 AM PDT:
Interesting post. I receive 100+ spam mails into GMail account but, only 1 or 2 make it into Inbox, where as on Yahoo, I get more than 25% of spam make it into the Inbox.
said on December 13, 2007 6:58 PM PDT:
GMAIL rocks. Just one SPAM I got in the last two months (out of 2000 + genuine mails). I also visit the spam folder just to make sure everything marked by GMail as spam is indeed spam. Perfect. Never marked a genuine one as SPAM. Look at aol/Yahoo or Hotmail. After 20 days, I logged on to Yahoo Messenger and been notified that I got 37 new emails. I checked and ALL Spam ! An yesr back, I stopped giving out my Yahoo as my contact address ! Waiting for a GOperating System, GMessenger, GDisk Management software, GAntiVirus, lol.
said on December 14, 2007 1:06 AM PDT:
Anonymous halsevil@yahoo.co.uk said on Tuesday, October 30, 2007:
"Using Gmail with Firefox knocks off my internet connection - not always but at least 80% of the time... I now use Interent Explorer for Google related sites and Firefox for the rest."Same happens to me; when I open "
span" folder, Firefox 2.x ceases to respond.
But both Firefix 3 (beta) and IE run fine.
Scott said on December 15, 2007 12:42 PM PDT:
Gmail seems to work pretty well for me. I use email sparingly:3-10 a week but I may get 300+ spam, so it is a great hassle-free (almost) system. I have a very low % of false positive. Gmail is 99% effective. And getting better.
said on January 12, 2008 3:00 PM PDT:
Gmail makes a good spam filter
http://www.iopus.com/guides/gmail-spam-filter.htm
Carmactin said on February 2, 2008 8:15 AM PDT:
top this news?
Aaron said on February 16, 2008 7:10 AM PDT:
Isn't working that great anymore :(
How can I block any emails with pharmacy or in foreign languarges?
Create a filter that automatically sends to trash all the messages that contain pharmacy. Gmail also has an operator for finding messages written in a certain language: lang:russian for Russian.
You could enter something like:
pharmacy OR lang:russian OR lang:chinese
in the "Has the words" box to block all the messages that contain Russian / Chinese text or "pharmacy".
spirit46 said on February 26, 2008 10:32 AM PDT:
I think as a Paying member of Gmail we should have that option to turn off the spam filter.
Gmail's spamfilter is great at putting spam in the spam-folder. I guess since Google is generous and gives a way several gigabytes, they think they can just dump all junkmail on their users. I still have to go through masses of spam each day to see if one valid messege happens to be there. It would have been better if identified spam never reached the inbox at all, if let's say a thousand users have identified that particular spam as spam (high probability it is spam then). Also, I don't see how spam can come to one of my gmail accounts when I have never ever typed it or posted it anywhere? Does Gmail sell our addresses to spamfirms or what?
"...spam never reached the inbox at all,..." I meant "account" and not inbox, 'cause it doesn't reach the inbox!
<< Also, I don't see how spam can come to one of my gmail accounts when I have never ever typed it or posted it anywhere? Does Gmail sell our addresses to spamfirms or what? >>
Use your brain. Spammers have all kinds of ways to build databases of email addresses. For example, if they know bilhopper@aol.com is a valid address, it's reasonable to test if billhopper@gmail.com (@yahoo.com, @hotmail.com etc.) are valid addresses. There are also databases built automatically from common names, words etc.
said on March 27, 2008 6:03 AM PDT:
It is very interesting
said on April 1, 2008 7:44 PM PDT:
I thought Google Spam Filter was a good thing till I noticed it was zapping a lot of my business related emails from non-spam sources.
Why Google. Why?
said on April 2, 2008 8:15 PM PDT:
Why doesn't Google turn it around and use their filters to stop the spam originating from gmail accounts? I find that blocking everyting from google over email or usenet stops nearly half the spam I get and it's very fast and doesn't need OCR technology.
said on April 3, 2008 12:58 AM PDT:
I've been told by some of my friends recently that they discovered my gmail e-mail in spam folder(including in gmail also).
Is there a way I can find out was it in reality "blacklisted" or smth, and for what reason?
Regards,
Andrey
Google doesn't use blacklists, it only filters email messages. Obviously, some email addresses and some domains are more likely to send spam, but the messages aren't blocked just because they're sent from these addresses.
True, I started receiving spams in my comment part of my blog until I enabled the picture verification utility there.
However, my gmail account is the best one when i think of spams. Even yahoo is not as successful as gmail is in blocking spams.
In 4 years of using gmail I have received less than 100 spams and this feels awesome.
said on April 14, 2008 4:53 PM PDT:
The problem is that g-mail also blocks genuine e-mail!
Why on earth you don't allow the use of a filter to "Mark as spam" I do not know.
I hate having filters that send stuff straight to the bin, when I am 100% certain it should be marked as spam and go to junk. It makes my bin messier than it should be.
Thanks for your time,
Steve Daniels
said on May 14, 2008 9:49 PM PDT:
I agree that Gmail has a tough job of trying to track and block spam... but I just want the ability to turn the spam filter off and choose for myself. For me the risk of false positives is not acceptable, whilst for some you, you are happy to take the risk or you regulalry check online. Fine, so let the user choose what suits them. The spam filter nearly just cost me a significant portion of money. I 'pop' all of my gmail through to my Outlook, and check gmail online only when travelling. I have an investment planner who recently was trying to send me an important email with a financial deadline. After days he rang to find out why I hadn't replied. I told him I hadn't received it. He sent it a few more times but it just didn't get here. Finally he said 'Can you go online and check, we've been having problems with gmail lately', and lo and behold there they were, piled up in my spam folder, along with a couple of others from my accountant and friends and so forth (actually more false positives than real spam). We nearly missed the deadline. Lucky because I didn't even think of checking the web base gmail. So whats the story? I have received many emails from him previously, and still some of his were getting through at the time, but it selectively targets others of his. He is from a small, local, reputable financial planning company and was using his personal company address (ie. he doesn't spam) from a legitimate domain. So why was he blacklisted? Secondly, what legal responsibility does google have to it's users? They could cost this poor guy a lot off money/business just by not letting him get his emails through to even established clients. I asked him what he can do about this known problem and his reply is 'Nothing, Google is a powerful and faceless entity/enemy and there is no one that will help - once blacklisted thats that'. I now wonder what other legitimate emails have expired and been deleted from my Spam folder. I have multiple email addresses used for different things and normally don't get much spam to my business ones because I use them cautiously. Quite simply, why can't Google just gives its users the choice to enable spam filtering dependant upon our needs.
Jean said on July 21, 2008 6:08 PM PDT:
OK. I got a Geico quote for car insurance. Next day I have more than 20 spam messages in Gmail spam about car insurance. I noticed the same with other emails before. It seems to me that Google is selling email addresses by received content. Did anyone else have this experience???
knops1@gmail.com
@Jean:
From where did you get the quote?
said on August 9, 2008 2:09 AM PDT:
I like the way "Jean" complains about receiving spam; then goes and leaves his full address for the friendly bots to collect!
My experience of spam handling on GMail is that after foolishly signing up for a competition website in a brief moment of desparation, I ended up having to create loads of filters on individual words and bits of domain names, and I get the same constant spam in my bin ("trash" to Americans) ...the same named stuff... usually about 50 a day, with the occasional non-spam amidst them.
My daily GMail routine involves a quick scan of the contents of my bin; then "select all" and "mark as spam".
I very rarely get anything unwanted in my inbox... maybe at a rate of once every three months maximum at a guess.
What does annoy me, is that the same stuff keeps appearing in my bin, and no amount of "marking as spam" seems to result in any part of the e-mail being stored in memory to be perpetually filtered straight to my spambox... though it does occasionally happen.
Perhaps I'm missing someaught?
Jim said on August 11, 2008 11:42 PM PDT:
i totally agree. Google spam filter is very effective. I love it.
said on August 18, 2008 2:44 PM PDT:
why the hell are you lot worried about it - best cure for spam - simply ignore it, meanwhile I have to waste time every month salvaging my requested emails from the spam muncher & if I am but one day late it is gone forever, adding to contacts, marking as non spam etc do nothing - the same senders are shot down again & again - plus a few new ones each week - otherwise I do like gmail.
Diana said on September 15, 2008 4:59 PM PDT:
Google is not good. I have so much spam. I get hundreds of spam from google. I hardly get any from yahoo. I feel google does not try to stop this because they are making money off us. I am thinking about not having google for my e-mail address any more.
Diana
said on September 15, 2008 7:12 PM PDT:
Gmail spam filter is great for most personal emails, but what about the other side of the spectrum - business users that have false-positives of staff and/or new clients/contacts...they wouldn't be too impressed with a filter like that.
(from a student's view; using it as your contact email for potential employers...2 false-positives out of 35 received emails, almost 6% error rate)
Gmail doesn't mark as spam the messages from your contacts, but
there are some exceptions. You can also create filters to never mark as spam messages that meet certain conditions.
DEBORAH said on September 30, 2008 3:52 PM PDT:
I am a new user and I am now getting over 40 spams items per day!! What's up with Gmail "supposedly" improving their spam filters?
Not good service to your customers!!
Anonoymous in West Chester, Ohio
said on October 7, 2008 4:14 AM PDT:
I have been using Gmail as a spam filter for three years now and there is not much I can complain about.
When working as our web administrator I forwarded all personal, webmaster, abuse etc. addresses to my Gmail account. Out of 30.000 spams per month only 0-2 got through every day. We used to have SpamAssassin and a couple of other solutions but they were worse in every imaginable respect. They let spam come through and they lost valuable messages like big orders, sales letters and so forth.
It does occur every now and then that Gmail eats one of your messages but that is a very, very rare case. And what on earth could one do with this flood of crap (all in all 50.000 spams/month to just five people). I do not think there will ever be a bullet-proof system.
As for myself I would be prepared to pay for Gmail filtering it it were available separately.
said on October 14, 2008 9:44 PM PDT:
I like GMAIL best, bit there is feature in HOTMAIL that I love. Hotmail allows you to block all e-mail from addresses that are not included in your contact list. I wish GMAIL could implement something like this.
Mario
Yeah hahaha, Gmail catches thousand of spam messages while Yahoo only hundred or so. Good job gmail.
David said on November 15, 2008 12:57 PM PDT:
I can identify and relate to several of the posts on here...I had been with Gmail for months and had received NO spam at all. Having a momentary lapse, my quote request wasn't for car insurance but for a car loan. Next thing I know, poof, my mail was immediately bombarded with spam, from ALL kinds of sources, and yes mainly regarding car loans.
I was ticked about it at first, but over time, after tweaking various spam filters and settings, and using the "Mark as Spam" feature, the bulk of it goes right where it should, in the Spam folder. I can easily skim through there and see if any legitimate messages went through, which now is a rarity (over 6 months since the last).
Before Gmail, I was using Yahoo, Hotmail, and AOL...none of these has the spam filtering that GMail does. I still have them, but am slowly weaning away from those accounts in hopes of closing them. I go to check on them very sporatically now and its always the same, 97% or more is all spam. Now there are occasional legitmate items that come there, which I will route to Gmail, but very few.
Anyone who complains about the filtering, is either impatient, and expecting instant results; or isn't using the filters and settings correctly. It takes time for the filtering to work for each individual account in the way the user expects. I'd much rather have most or all spam going to one place that I can check instead of needing to check the inbox and the spam box. Is is a perfect system--definitely not; is there room for improvements--of course. However, as I see it, the folks at the helm are listening to the feedback they're getting and making changes where they can. As someone mentioned before, no system is perfect, however this one is pretty darn good.
Sue said on December 3, 2008 4:28 AM PDT:
I think there should be an option for those who would find it useful, to stop/bin the spam before it even reaches the Spam folder. I just don't want to see it at all.
Mole said on December 11, 2008 4:55 PM PDT:
What I don't understand is that I hardly ever get spam in my hotmail or yahoo account: Junkmail folder or inbox.
My gmail account gets an abudance of viagra, online degrees, knock off watches etc etc etc Why do I have to see this. I don't want them in my email account at all. Can't they block these things? I'm going to migrate back to hotmail or yahoo. At least I can control what goes into my account.
said on January 5, 2009 3:02 PM PDT:
well i do agree that i dont get any spam into my gmail inbox. but i am always wondering why does gmail receive most of the spam than any other email servers. I have been an active user of gmail since about 2 years and that of yahoo since 7 years, but i do get a lot many times spam in gmail than in yahoo.
Recently i have to delete a 1000 spam emails in gmail within a week time while i got about 10 spam mails in yahoo..
I wonder if gmail is spamming the emails to prove their spam filter better or if gmail accounts are more susceptible than other accounts.
minorhill said on January 16, 2009 12:24 PM PDT:
my youtube comments going directly to spam folder,why?
situ said on January 26, 2009 11:17 PM PDT:
how to convert my gamil account in to the new version?
said on February 3, 2009 12:22 PM PDT:
The interesting thing is that my gmail address is a very non-standard letters and numbers and I started getting spam from the first month - and I hadn't really started using the account yet. I believed that Gmail had been hacked.
Oh well.... it's free,
Regards, Irv
said on February 11, 2009 7:11 AM PDT:
When i started using my gmail account i didn't have problem with spams but in last 4 months its flooded with spams even i get spams in languages i dont knowlike chinese or arabic how can i stop it
Do you get many spam messages that aren't detected by Gmail? Don't forget to flag messages as spam instead of deleting them. Gmail will learn from your actions and you'll receive less spam in your inbox.
Nate said on February 15, 2009 7:58 PM PDT:
How do I get my WebSite off the Spam List...
I own a Web Hosting Company and everytime I send out an e-mail, It's marked as spam.
This is awful.
said on February 16, 2009 9:07 AM PDT:
I have a gmail account that gets no spam, knock on wood, so when my wife decided to go digital I had her open a gmail account because I didn't get spam in mine. Within a week she had spam in her Spam box, very little ends up in her inbox most gets filtered. Now she doesn't get putting her email address everywhere, mainly she uses email to correspond with her kids, and a few friends.
The only thing I can figure is here id is pretty generic like grammiexxxx@ and mine is not it's unrelated terms put together.
I have many a client who has a gmail.com account, even though they paid for a subscription to their newsletters, they mark me as spam even though there is an unsubscribe link at the top of the mail.
The thing is that I don't ever receive messages that their mails have been identified as spam. I really think gmail should offer some sort of feedback loop system because sometimes email is in the spam folder and it isn't spam.
Yeah I think Google is too "effective": we have a problem with false positives. We can't send email to ourselves!
e said on April 8, 2009 8:17 PM PDT:
well i think its google they are a search engine sending spam to your email even tho its in the spam folder it still there to look at, i get over 70 spams a day Thats Good ?? my email is only used for people i know ,so where is spam coming from how they get my email address ?
said on April 24, 2009 8:37 AM PDT:
As many have said before me, Google should block the spam at their server level and not forward it to our mailbox.. Why go through the extra step of having to remove the spam? C'mon Google.. Get with it!!!!
Block the spam at your server.. DON'T SEND IT TO ME PLEASE... That is the only complaint I have with G-mail..
AGREE !! STOP SPAMM IN THE SERVER !
I hate to use GMAIL anymore.
I hate spam and gmail doesn't do anything with it.
Why i need see in my email account Spam : (260)
to get in and delete ?
What is that ?...
Sorry but i think google goes back in technology.
And i'm not talking about gmail server fall couple weeks ago, youtube servers are slow and etc.
With all the good stuff that google has they have lot more problems.
Sorry for that.
I'm going to search another email provider service then Gmail till it be fixed
Dave said on May 18, 2009 3:48 AM PDT:
Gmail also has a problem with identifying legitimate email as spam. Gmail sends EVERY email from @live.com to spam by default. Sounds like petty back-biting with MS.
@Dave:
Can you prove that "Gmail sends EVERY email from @live.com to spam by default"? I can prove that your affirmation is inaccurate with a single email received in my inbox from a live.com address. Gmail's anti-spam rules aren't that simple as you might think and sometimes even the messages sent by Google services are flagged as spam.
DJTEAZER said on May 23, 2009 2:35 PM PDT:
I don't think my GMAIL account is curving spam, I've created so many filters using the words (i.e) {Viagra, viagra, Sex, SEX,... etc.} and yet, every day, I get the same emails from 25 different email addresses... So if its being filtered, its being recycled right back to my spam section...
rharding said on July 9, 2009 12:06 PM PDT:
I have the opposite problem with Gmail spam filters. They are blocking my e-mail to people who want it. I only send out an e-mail every 3 or 4 months to people who really want it and Gmail's spam blockers block my e-mails. I have sent them e-mail to support@gmail.com but they don't respond. How am I supposed to tell them to quit preventing my e-mail messages? I have a list of less than 200 people. rharding2007@gmail.com
Sometimes inbuild spam filtering doesn't seem to work. In that case gmail provides a good way to get rid of spam. You can actually alter your gmail id before submitting to doubtful sites.
Here is how you do it.
http://codeforfuture.com/2009/06/24/how-to-alter-your-gmail-id-before-submitting-it-to-any-doubtful-site/