The great thing about Google Sets is that it only did one thing and did it very well: automatically generating lists from a few examples. Google Sets used the explicit and implicit lists from the pages indexed by Google and tried to find the lists that were relevant to the examples entered by users. For example, you could enter "Honda" and "Toyota" and Google Sets returned a long list of car brands.
The patent filed in 2003 explains that, at that time, there wasn't any "mechanism for quickly and efficiently generating lists of items given one or more example". Web pages included a lot of lists: some of them were created using special HTML tags (<ul>, <ol>, document headers), others used tables, while most of them were items separated by commas or tabs. The patent was filed by Simon Tong, a researcher who contributed to Google's ranking algorithm, designed AdSense's targeting algorithm and Gmail's spam detection's learning algorithm, and Jeff Dean, who designed Google's crawling, indexing, and query serving systems, BigTable and MapReduce, the initial version of Google's advertising serving system and a lot more.
Google Sets was the building block for Google Squared, a service that generated lists and information about the items. If you type "dogs" in Google Squared, you'll see a list of dog breeds, related images, descriptions, the size and the country of origin. The list of dog breeds is now also displayed at the bottom of Google's results page for [dogs]. The attributes aren't yet available in Google Search, but this feature will probably added in the future.
While Google Sets and Google Squared will no longer be available, they're still used in Google Search to better understand the content of a page and to provide lists of related searches.
Update: Google Sets is still available as a Google Spreadsheets feature.
Google Sets functionality will stay perhaps available - one never knows for sure with Google - from Google Docs spreadsheets using Ctrl+dragdown.
ReplyDeleteSee: https://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&answer=75509&topic=1360901
'Also, if Auto-Fill doesn't recognise your content, you can try using Google Sets, a Google Labs product, to establish a pattern. For more information about Google Sets and other Google Labs products, visit http://labs.google.com/sets. To use Google Sets with AutoFill, complete steps 1 and 2 above, and in step 3, press Ctrl (Windows and Linux) or Option (Mac) while you click and drag the blue box to select additional cells.'
Damn, I found Google Sets a very usefull tool! I hate how google only thinks of the masses, and the thousands of sets-users forming the minority are just ignored.
ReplyDeleteIt is a pretty sad day! I just have discovered recently this tool and found it very useful. Now they're going to shut it down. Now I come to understand that Google is a very unreliable service. They shut down Google Dictionary recently and now this set tool. What's next, Google? Gmail, perhaps?
ReplyDeletehmmm...sayonara...
ReplyDeletebut i hope any others change for it...more than it..more cool...hihihihi
Is not google Square functionality already built into Google image search. via the following two options;
ReplyDeleteSort by subject
Sort by relevence
Of all the labs, Google Sets is one of the first and remains one of the most useful when trying to find related items. I wish Google would provide the functionality via some other tool.
ReplyDeleteWould have been great if this lab experiment would have had graduated.
ReplyDeleteIs set features consumed in other Google products? like Google search?
ReplyDeleteGood reminder to not rely on Google for planned site features. I'll have to find another way to add a feature I thought may be a differentiator for me. Thanks for the heads up.
ReplyDeleteNaah.... Where's the Dislike- or "-1"-button when you need one :(
ReplyDelete:( Was really hoping this Lab would survive the genocide currently going on at Google.
ReplyDeleteI do wish to find something with similar functionality. I regularly use google sets to find related movies, songs in genres, etc. I even use it as a more intuitive thesaurus.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely a shame.
I better get my list on before then.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure they've got some cut and dry, by-the-numbers approach that determines which Google sites remain and those they decide to discontinue but one which I find hard to understand, irksome in its implementation.
ReplyDeleteGoogle Notebook, Google Sets are two specific tools I found particularly useful, seem low maintenance compared to the services provided, that are being phased out, yet keep sites such as Custom Search, Google Groups, Knol, who has even heard of Knol?, available.
google seem to be on a rampage of product closures at the moment, likely a cost cutting measure like everyone else in these economic times..
ReplyDeleteI'm also going to miss it. Any time I only knew about one or two of a particular thing I would go there to find more. For posterity I took a screenshot of my last Sets search when I was looking a Mailchimp alternatives.
ReplyDeletei think we're gonna have to keep booting up the clunky Google AdSense Keyword Tool now that Google Sets is gone
ReplyDeleteGoogle sets was in decline. It started out very useful, but the last few times I tried to use it, the results were quite disappointing.
ReplyDelete@ahab
ReplyDeleteThanks Ahab, that worked like a charm. For anyone who misses Google Sets, check out ahab's link and comment (the very first comment).
Well, thats too bad. I liked this tool !
ReplyDeleteA sad day. I have used sets for years, and today when I want to list off CPU processing (like MMU, PhysX, GPU, FPU) I find it closed.
ReplyDeleteIts easy to see why though. How can Google make money from single word answers (rhetorical question - don't send postcards).
I cry at night missing Sets. Please bring it back.
ReplyDeleteI've been seeing this question popup in almost every SEO community I participate in. "Are there any good alternatives to Google Sets?"
ReplyDeleteWell, I'd feel like a hero if I had arrived at the answer on my own, but a fellow named Ben discovered that you can use a simple Google Docs spreadsheet to pull data from Google sets.
I thought it was so useful that I wrote a blog post about it with instructions:
http://glenmcniel.com/google-sets-alternative-no-clone-replacement-api-needed/
This is very frustrating to me. I have used Google Sets for many years and have depended on it in a specialized manner since the first time I used it. I am sad.
ReplyDeleteThis sucks. I've used it countless times for various purposes. Gotta find another way.
ReplyDelete:((((((((
ReplyDeletethis was useful tool.....
ReplyDeleteany alternative tool of google sets???
Don't know any alternative. If anyone has a similar project, please share !
ReplyDeleteYes,I concur with most of the sentiments. Please bring Sets back.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the reason for this product not to graduate? I like it a lot!
ReplyDeleteAw... such a useful thing. =[
ReplyDeleteBoo! This was one of those tools that I rarely used, but when I did it was really, really useful. :(
ReplyDeleteAre they any other tools like google sets?
ReplyDeleteOmg Why Google did this, It was one of the most Important tools for my Business
ReplyDeleteAnyone have any other suggestion?
ReplyDeleteJust think, if google sets was around, I could use it to search for tools that achieve a similar purpose... but the irony of course being that if it was still around, I'd never need to use it in such a way. Such is life after the demise of locally executing applications that can be kept/used long term... now that we have the vanishing cloud... we can expect this to happen more often
ReplyDeleteIt was google sets that decided on a name for my youngest son: typing my name, my wives name and my daugters name resulted in 1 (and only 1) name within Google Sets - and that is the name we gave to our son: David. (DLK)
ReplyDeletewhat the hell
ReplyDeleteDamn! I used this tool every few months and have done for many years.
ReplyDeleteGoogle sets is really awesome. So if it is shutdown, I expect better thing will be coming up better than ever.
ReplyDelete